How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (2024)

  • Introduction

Despite spending more money per capita on healthcare than any similarly large and wealthy nation, the United States has a lower life expectancy than peer nations and has seen worsening health outcomes since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

This chart collection combines various measures of quality of care in the United States and other large, high-income nations to show how the U.S. stacks up against its peers and how that has changed over time. While inconsistent and imperfect metrics make it difficult to firmly assess system-wide health quality, measures of long-term health outcomes, treatment outcomes, patient safety, and patient experiences suggest the U.S. health system provides lower-quality care than its peers. The U.S. performs worse in long-term health outcomes measures (such as life expectancy), certain treatment outcomes (such as maternal mortality and congestive heart failure hospital admissions), some patient safety measures (such as obstetric trauma with instrument and medication or treatment errors), and patient experiences of not getting care due to cost. The U.S. performs similarly to or better than peer nations in othermeasures of treatment outcomes (such as mortality rates within 30 days of acute hospital treatment) and patient safety (such as rates of postoperative sepsis).

Long-Term Health Outcomes

Life expectancy continued to drop in the U.S. in 2021 while rebounding in most peer countries

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (1)

As discussed in more detail in a  separate brief, life expectancy at birth was similar in the U.S. and peer countries on average in 1980 (73.7 and 74.5 years, respectively), but the gap has grown substantially in the following decades, as peer nations saw more rapid improvement in life expectancy than the U.S. The COVID-19 pandemic further widened this gap, and life expectancy in 2021 was 6 years shorter in the U.S. than in peer countries (76.4 years in the U.S. and averaged 82.3 years in comparable countries, on average).

The above data are period life expectancy estimates, based on excess mortality observed in each year. The period life expectancy at birth represents the mortality experience of a hypothetical cohort if current conditions persisted into the future, not the mortality experience of a birth cohort.

Since the pandemic, the gap in mortality rates between the U.S. and comparable countries has widened

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (2)

All-cause mortality rates — the number of deaths per 100,000 people, adjusted for age differences across countries — plateaued in the U.S. in the 2010s, while continuing to fall in other peer nations. From 1980 to 2020 (the latest year with comparable data), the overall mortality rate from all causes of death in the U.S. fell by about 19%, compared to a 43% decline in peer countries.

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increased mortality across most nations, though the U.S. saw a significantly higher increase than many other countries. The gap in mortality rates between the United States and peer nations was at its highest point in 2020.

Premature death rates in the U.S. continue to be higher than in comparable countries

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (3)

In addition to overall mortality rates, the “years of life lost” metric marks the extent of premature deaths within a population by providing more weight to deaths at younger ages. The U.S. and comparable OECD countries have made progress in reducing years of life lost from 1990 to 2019 (down 24% and 42%, respectively), although the gap between the U.S. and comparable countries has increased over time.

The U.S. had the highest increase in premature deaths due the pandemic in 2020 and 2021. The per capita premature excess death rate in the U.S. was over twice as high as the next closest peer country, the U.K. The higher rate of new premature deaths in the U.S. compared to peer countries was driven in part by racial disparities within the U.S. The premature excess death rates for American Indian and Alaska Native, Black, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander populations in the U.S. were 3 times higher than the rates among White or Asian populations. The U.S. health system consistently results in higher rates of mortality and premature deaths among people of color.

Children and teens in the U.S. are less likely to make it to adulthood than in peer countries, with the U.S having higher rates of motor vehicle accidents, firearm deaths, and suicide deaths among children and teens.

Disease burden, which accounts for both premature death and years living with disability, is often measured using disability adjusted life years (DALYs).  As of 2019 — the most recent year with available data — DALYs  have declined in the U.S. and comparable countries since 2000, though the U.S. continued to have higher age-adjusted disease burden rates than peer countries. In 2019, the DALY rate was 37% higher in the U.S. than in comparable countries, on average.

Treatment Outcomes

30-day mortality for strokes is lower in the U.S. than in comparable countries, on average

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (6)

Mortality within 30 days of being admitted to a hospital is not entirely preventable, but high quality of care can reduce the mortality rate for certain diagnoses. The 30-day mortality rates after hospital admissions for heart attacks (acute myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic stroke (caused by bleeding) are similar in the U.S. and comparable countries average. The 30-day mortality rates for ischemic strokes (caused by blood clots) was 4.3 deaths per 100 patients in the U.S. in 2020, compared to an average of 6.2 deaths per 100 patients in similar countries. While the U.S. has lower rates of mortality due to these conditions than the average across peer nations, it is important to note that several peer nations have lower rates than the U.S.

Maternal mortality rates in the U.S. have risen over time and are much higher than in peer countries

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (7)

While wealth and economic prosperity are highly correlated with lower maternal mortality rates, the U.S. is an outlier with the highest rate of pregnancy-related deaths (23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2020) when compared to similar countries (3.6 deaths per 100,000 live births).

Within the U.S., there are significant racial disparities in maternal mortality rates. The maternal mortality rate for Black mothers is about 3 times the rate for White mothers — a disparity that persists across age and socioeconomic groups.Every race and ethnicity, socioeconomic, and age group in the United States sees higher maternal mortality rates than the average in comparable countries. Maternal mortality in the U.S. has risen in recent years, sparking concern from the medical community and regulators.

Related Content:

Racial disparities in premature deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic

How does U.S. life expectancy compare to other countries?

Hospital admissions for diabetes and congestive heart failure were more frequent in the U.S. than average across comparable countries

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (10)

Hospital admissions for certain chronic diseases, such as cardiac conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD), asthma, and diabetes, can arise for a variety of reasons, but preventive services — or lack thereof — play a large role. Hospital admission rates in the U.S. are higher than in comparable countries for congestive heart failure and complications due to diabetes, and some admissions for these chronic conditions could be minimized with adequate primary care. Admission rates in 2020 are likely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic —patients were less likely to seek hospital treatment, and hospitals were at times overwhelmed and unable to admit patients who would have been admitted in a different year.

More cesarean sections are performed in the U.S. than in comparable countries

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (11)

Cesarean sections are one of the most commonlyperformed surgical procedures in the U.S. and have become a key indicator of quality of care in maternal health. Cesarean sections can be lifesaving — however, when they are not medically indicated, they can pose unnecessary  risks  for mothers, including an increased chance of blood clots, infections, and other complications that require further surgery.

The U.S. has consistently had higher cesarean section rates than most of its peers, though rates have decreased slightly in recent years. In 2021, the rate of cesarean sections per 1,000 live births was 321 in the U.S. and an average of 267 in comparable countries.

Patient Safety

Obstetric trauma during vagin*l delivery is more common in the U.S. than in most comparable countries, especially when instruments are involved

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (12)

Obstetric trauma is more likely to occur in deliveries where instruments are utilized (i.e., forceps). The rate of obstetric trauma during deliveries with an instrument in the U.S. was 11.7 per 100 vagin*l deliveries in 2020, higher than most comparable countries with available data. The rate of obstetric trauma during deliveries without an instrument in the U.S. was 1.7 per 100 vagin*l deliveries in 2020, on the lower end among comparable countries with available data.

Post-operative complications — such as pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis — are more common in the U.S. than most peer countries

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (13)

Rates of post-operative complications are an important measure of hospital safety. Pulmonary embolisms and deep vein thrombosis are common complications after major surgeries, such as hip or knee replacement. The prevalence of post-operative clots for these procedures is higher in the U.S. than in the U.K., Sweden, Belgium, and the Netherlands, but lower than in Australia.

Post-operative sepsis is less common in the U.S. than in most peer countries

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (14)

Sepsis is a serious complication for patients with infections, and effects can range from organ failure and shock to death in severe cases. Rates of post-operative infections and sepsis are an important marker of care quality for patients undergoing surgery, because this is a major source of morbidity and mortality that can sometimes be prevented. Prevention is multifactorial and can involve proper operative techniques and training, hygiene and safety protocols, and antibiotic utilization, amongst other things. The rate of post-operative sepsis following abdominal surgery is just under 2% in the U.S., lower than in most peer countries that report data.

The U.S. has higher rates of reported medication and treatment errors than most comparable countries

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (15)

Patients in the U.S. are more likely than those in comparable countries to report experiencing a medication or medical error at some point during their care, according to a  survey  by the Commonwealth Fund. In this case, medication errors include being given the wrong medication or dose, and treatment errors indicate that people thought a medical mistake had been made in their treatment or care. In 2020, 12.6% of patients in the U.S. experienced a medical error compared to 11.4% of patients in similar countries.

Among peer countries, the U.S. had the lowest rate of retained surgical item or unretrieved device fragments in 2020

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (16)

Unintentionally retained items or device fragments following surgical procedures can result in pain, infection and even life-threatening consequences for patients. The U.S. has the lowest rate of retained surgical items or unretrieved device fragments in 2020, at 1.6 per 100,000 surgical hospital discharges,compared to an average rate of 8.2 per 100,000 surgical hospital discharges in comparable countries.

Patient Experiences

The U.S. has higher rates of consultations missed due to costs than comparable countries in 2020

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (17)

Patients in the U.S. are more likely to experience missed consultations with their provider due to costs. In 2020, the rate of consultations missed due to costs in the U.S. was 26.8 per 100 patients, compared to 7.0 per 100 patients on average in comparable nations for the same year. When patients choose not to meet with their physicians due to cost or any other reason, it can lead to worse health outcomes and more expensive care needed at later points in the patient’s life.

There are limited comparable measures of quality available. Among measures we can compare, the U.S. performs similarly or better than its peers for when intensive, acute care is required, such as for 30-day mortality after heart attack or stroke admissions. However, for long-term health measures and conditions where care coordination or public health efforts may improve outcomes (for example, maternal outcomes or chronic condition hospitalization rates), the U.S. consistently falls short. Of particular concern, outcomes measures such as all-cause mortality, maternal mortality, and years of life lost have stagnated or worsened in the U.S. in recent years, even as peer nations have seen improvement in these metrics.

Throughout this chart collection, measures such as long-term health outcomes, treatment outcomes, patient safety, and patient experiences are used as a proxy to analyze the quality of health systems in the U.S. and 11 other countries identified as similarly wealthy based on total GDP and GDP per capita. While these indicators allow for cross-country comparisons, they do not necessarily provide a comprehensive overview of the quality of each country’s respective health system. Additional indicators can be used to provide further insight into the quality of countries’ health systems. However, country specific differences in population health, payment systems, survey metrics/methods, and demographics present barriers to cross country comparisons.

Methods

Most data used here are sourced from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which compiles health quality statistics and data from member nations.

All cause age-adjusted mortality data was interpolated for the U.K. in 2000 and Australia in 2005 due to unavailable data.

Related Content:

How does U.S. life expectancy compare to other countries?

COVID-19 leading cause of death ranking

C-section data is not available for Belgiumand Sweden from 2000-2004, Switzerland from 2000-2001, Belgium from 2015 and the Netherlands from 2011 and 2020; 2021 data is not yet available for Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.Data points are interpolated for the comparable country average in those years.

About this site

The Peterson Center on Healthcare and KFFare partnering to monitor how well the U.S. healthcare system is performing in terms of quality and cost.

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (20) How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (21)

Stay Connected

Get the best of the Health System Tracker delivered to your inbox.

Get the best of the Health System Tracker delivered to your inbox.

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker (2024)

FAQs

How does the quality of the U.S. health system compare to other countries? ›

The U.S. has the lowest life expectancy at birth, the highest death rates for avoidable or treatable conditions, the highest maternal and infant mortality, and among the highest suicide rates. The U.S. has the highest rate of people with multiple chronic conditions and an obesity rate nearly twice the OECD average.

How does health spending in the US compare to other countries health system tracker? ›

In 2020, the U.S. spent 19.7% of its GDP on health consumption (up from 17.6% in 2019). In 2021, health spending as a share of GDP declined to 18.3% in the U.S.—but remains substantially higher than in peer countries.

How do US healthcare resources compare to other countries? ›

The U.S. has fewer acute care hospital beds per capita than in most comparable countries, with the exception of Canada and Sweden. The number of acute hospital beds per 1,000 population fell in the U.S. from 3.0 in 2000 to 2.5 in 2017.

How does the US health care system differ from other countries with universal health care? ›

Other countries have single-payer systems led by the government and universal healthcare that generally pays for the costs of care for all citizens. The U.S. has an overly complex healthcare system fragmented across private and public markets with a large variety of players and competing interests.

How does the US compare to other countries in quality of life? ›

The United States performs well in many dimensions of well-being relative to other countries in the Better Life Index. The United States outperforms the average in income, jobs, education, environmental quality, social connections and life satisfaction.

Is America healthy compared to other countries? ›

The U.S. spends more on health care but has worse health outcomes than comparable countries around the globe. This holds true across age and income groups. Within the U.S., there are unacceptable disparities in health by race and ethnic group, county by county and state by state.

What is Peterson KFF Health System Tracker? ›

The Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker is an online hub monitoring how well the U.S. health system is operating through key quality and cost measures.

How does the US health care system fare when compared to other healthcare systems? ›

Health expenditures per person in the U.S. were $12,555 in 2022, which was over $4,000 more than any other high-income nation. The average amount spent on health per person in comparable countries ($6,651) is about half of what the U.S. spends per person.

How and why does US health care differ from that in other OECD countries? ›

The OECD countries provide more physicians and more acute care hospital beds, whereas the United States provides much more high-tech services, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and mammograms, proportionately more specialists, more amenities (privacy and space in hospitals), and more standby capacity as ...

Why is the US the best healthcare system? ›

It has a large and well-trained health workforce, a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, a robust health sector research program and, for selected services, among the best medical outcomes in the world.

How does the US compare to other developed countries when considering health outcomes? ›

Although life expectancy and survival rates in the United States have improved dramatically over the past century, Americans live shorter lives and experience more injuries and illnesses than people in other high-income countries.

What differentiates America from other countries with respect of health care and its costs? ›

Patients in the U.S. have shorter average hospitals stays and fewer physician visits per capita, while many hospital procedures have been shown to have higher prices in the U.S. Similarly, many prescription drugs cost more in the U.S. than the same drugs do in other comparable nations.

How does the US healthcare system compare to other systems around the world? ›

However, despite higher healthcare spending, America's health outcomes are not any better than those in other developed countries. The United States actually performs worse in some common health metrics like life expectancy, infant mortality, and unmanaged diabetes.

What is the quality of healthcare in the United States? ›

The latest excellent/good rating for U.S. healthcare quality is just two percentage points lower than in 2021; however, it is well below the 62% high point twice recorded in the early 2010s. It also trails the average 55% reading since 2001. These findings are from Gallup's annual Health and Healthcare survey.

What distinguishes the US healthcare system from that of the United Kingdom? ›

The British ideology of their system is that healthcare is a basic human right, as shown through their public healthcare system with a universal baseline of care for all those within the U.K. population; the United States healthcare system, though, is widely perceived and shown to be a privilege to U.S. citizens with ...

Does the US have a high quality health system? ›

Despite having the most expensive health care system, the United States ranks last overall compared with six other industrialized countries—Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom—on measures of quality, efficiency, access to care, equity, and the ability to lead long, healthy, ...

Where does US rank in healthcare quality? ›

Introduction. The United States ranks 11th in the 2022 World Index of Healthcare Innovation, down from 6th in 2021 and 4th in 2020.

Which country has the best quality healthcare? ›

Countries With The Best Health Care Systems, 2024
RankCountryHealth Care Index (Overall)
1Taiwan78.72
2South Korea77.7
3Australia74.11
4Canada71.32
77 more rows
Apr 2, 2024

Is America's healthcare system the most efficient system? ›

The U.S. healthcare system is characterized as the world's most expensive yet least effective compared with other nations. Growing healthcare costs have made millions of citizens vulnerable.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rob Wisoky

Last Updated:

Views: 6011

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (48 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rob Wisoky

Birthday: 1994-09-30

Address: 5789 Michel Vista, West Domenic, OR 80464-9452

Phone: +97313824072371

Job: Education Orchestrator

Hobby: Lockpicking, Crocheting, Baton twirling, Video gaming, Jogging, Whittling, Model building

Introduction: My name is Rob Wisoky, I am a smiling, helpful, encouraging, zealous, energetic, faithful, fantastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.